DAO Resolution to Approve Legal Representation - July 3, 2023
The Governance Facilitators have placed a Governance Poll into the voting system on behalf of Support Facilitators. This Governance Poll will be active for three days beginning on Monday, July 3 at 16:00 UTC.
This is a binary vote.
- You may vote for a single option.
- You should vote for the option which you prefer.
- If you would accept either option, you should vote 'Abstain'.
Review
The community can vote in this poll to express support or opposition to the DAO Resolution that approves the following:
- Retain Perkins Coie LLP as counsel for MakerDAO for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit
- Appoint Samar Law as the representative of MakerDAO for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit, with full power and authority to make decisions with respect to the Lawsuit on behalf of MakerDAO, to create a special purpose entity for purposes of carrying out the mandate of this DAO Resolution, and to provide instructions to Perkins Coie on behalf of MakerDAO in the Lawsuit.
The full text of the DAO Resolution is included below, a copy of the Resolution has been pinned to IPFS with the hash QmawAWKApVmzJbMHMcLVPaoZv9uCQtKVzEWaLUBJt1KCG4
and can be accessed here.
DAO Resolution for the purpose of retaining Perkins Coie LLP as counsel for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit (defined herein) and appointing Samar Law as the authorized representative of MakerDAO for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit.
Background
On October 5, 2022, True Return Systems LLC (“True Return”) filed a lawsuit against MakerDAO in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“New York Court”), Case No. 1:22-cv-08478 (the “Lawsuit”). In the Lawsuit, True Return asserts that MakerDAO has infringed U.S. Patent 10,025,797. MakerDAO has not appeared in the Lawsuit. True Return filed a motion for default judgment against MakerDAO in which True Return seeks damages of more than $17 million USD.
On June 21, 2023, the New York Court issued an order (the “Order”) requiring that MakerDAO retain counsel. If MakerDAO does not retain counsel, then it is possible that MakerDAO would be subject to adverse consequences. For example, the New York Court could enter a default judgment against MakerDAO.
Accordingly, representatives of MakerDAO have engaged in discussions with U.S. counsel regarding possible representation to comply with the Order. Following these discussions, this proposal recommends that MakerDAO retains the firm of Perkins Coie LLP for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit and direct Perkins Coie LLP to enter an appearance in the Lawsuit.
In addition, in order to ensure that Perkins Coie LLP can effectively represent MakerDAO’s interest in the Lawsuit, this proposal also recommends that MakerDAO appoints Samar Law as the representative of MakerDAO for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit, with full power and authority to make decisions with respect to the Lawsuit on behalf of MakerDAO and to provide instructions to Perkins Coie on behalf of MakerDAO in the Lawsuit, including with respect to material decisions to participate in, appeal, continue, or terminate the Lawsuit. Samar Law will act in accordance with the Maker Atlas 1 and the scopes defined by The Atlas and will create a special purpose entity for purposes of carrying out the mandate of this DAO Resolution.
The purpose of this DAO Resolution is to (1) retain Perkins Coie LLP as counsel for MakerDAO for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit, and (2) appoint Samar Law as the representative of MakerDAO for the limited purposes of the Lawsuit, with full power and authority to make decisions with respect to the Lawsuit on behalf of MakerDAO, to create a special purpose entity for purposes of carrying out the mandate of this DAO Resolution, and to provide instructions to Perkins Coie on behalf of MakerDAO in the Lawsuit.
Please review the discussion thread to help inform your position before voting.
Outcomes
If the votes for the 'Yes' option exceed the votes for the 'No' option then the following actions will be taken:
- The DAO Resolution will be considered approved.
If the votes for the 'No' option equal or exceed the votes for the 'Yes' option then no further action will be taken at this time.
Resources
If you are new to voting in the Maker Protocol, please see the voting guide to learn how voting works.
Additional information about the Governance process can be found in the Maker Operational Manual.
To add current and upcoming votes to your calendar, please see the MakerDAO Governance Calendar.